Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 23:57

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Will friendly dogs protect their owners?
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Scientists learn how mosquitoes outsmart and evade human defenses - Earth.com
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
This email app is Gmail on steroids, and I can't recommend it enough - Android Police
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
BYD unleashes an EV industry reckoning that alarms Beijing - Fortune
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Engineers turn toxic ancient tomb fungus into anti-cancer drug - Phys.org